Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-05-01T01:13:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:06:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> If you create an unlogged sequence on a primary, pg_sequence_last_value()
>> for that sequence on a standby will error like so:
>> postgres=# select pg_sequence_last_value('test'::regclass);
>> ERROR: could not open file "base/5/16388": No such file or directory
>
>> As pointed out a few years ago [0], this function is undocumented, so
>> there's no stated contract to uphold. I lean towards just returning NULL
>> because that's what we'll have to put in the relevant pg_sequences field
>> anyway, but I can see an argument for fixing the ERROR to align with what
>> you see when you try to access unlogged relations on a standby (i.e.,
>> "cannot access temporary or unlogged relations during recovery").
>
> Yeah, I agree with putting that logic into the function. Putting
> such conditions into the SQL of a system view is risky because it
> is really, really painful to adjust the SQL in a released version.
> You could back-patch a fix for this if done at the C level, but
> I doubt we'd go to the trouble if it's done in the view.
Good point. I'll work on a patch along these lines, then.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Remove redundant privilege check from pg_sequences system view.
- 7967d10c5b49 18.0 landed
-
Fix pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys.
- 2812059d3eea 12.20 landed
- 09ec5d45548a 13.16 landed
- c8714230ad35 14.13 landed
- 857d280c6528 15.8 landed
- c1664c8eefad 16.4 landed
- 3cb2f13ac500 17.0 landed