Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-04-15T20:17:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2024-04-15 16:02:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 3:47 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > That said, I don't like the state after applying
> > https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdvuT6DnguzaV-M1UQ2whYGDojaNU%3D-%3DiHc0A7qo9HBEJw%40mail.gmail.com
> > because there's too much coupling. Hence talking about needing to iterate on
> > the interface in some form, earlier in the thread.
> 
> Mmph, I can't follow what the actual state of things is here. Are we
> waiting for Alexander to push that patch? Is he waiting for somebody
> to sign off on that patch?

I think Alexander is arguing that we shouldn't revert 27bc1772fc & dd1f6b0c17
in 17.  I already didn't think that was an option, because I didn't like the
added interfaces, but now am even more certain, given how broken dd1f6b0c17
seems to be:
https://postgr.es/m/20240415201057.khoyxbwwxfgzomeo%40awork3.anarazel.de


> Do you want that patch applied, not applied, or applied with some set of
> modifications?

I think we should apply Alexander's proposed revert and then separately
discuss what we should do about 041b96802ef.


> I find the discussion of "too much coupling" too abstract. I want to
> get down to specific proposals for what we should change, or not
> change.

I think it's a bit hard to propose something concrete until we've decided
whether we'll revert 27bc1772fc & dd1f6b0c17.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



Commits

  1. Remove extra comment at TableAmRoutine.scan_analyze_next_block

  2. revert: Generalize relation analyze in table AM interface

  3. Revert: Allow table AM to store complex data structures in rd_amcache

  4. Revert: Allow table AM tuple_insert() method to return the different slot

  5. Revert: Allow locking updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()

  6. Revert: Let table AM insertion methods control index insertion

  7. Revert: Custom reloptions for table AM

  8. Provide a way block-level table AMs could re-use acquire_sample_rows()

  9. Custom reloptions for table AM

  10. Use streaming I/O in ANALYZE.

  11. Revert "Custom reloptions for table AM"

  12. Let table AM insertion methods control index insertion

  13. Generalize relation analyze in table AM interface

  14. Improve error message for tts_(virtual|minimal)_is_current_xact_tuple

  15. Add comments on some MinimalTupleSlots methods usage

  16. Add TupleTableSlotOps.is_current_xact_tuple() method

  17. Allow table AM tuple_insert() method to return the different slot

  18. Allow table AM to store complex data structures in rd_amcache