Re: Another WaitEventSet resource leakage in back branches
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-11T16:29:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2024-03-22 21:15:45 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > While working on [1], I noticed $SUBJECT: WaitLatchOrSocket in back > branches is ignoring the possibility of failing partway through, too. > I added a PG_FAINALLY block to that function, like commit 555276f85. > Patch attached. Could you expand a bit on the concrete scenario you're worried about here? PG_TRY/CATCH aren't free, so adding something like this to a quite common path, in the back branches, without a concrete analysis as to why it's needed, seems a bit scary. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Fix WaitEventSet resource leak in WaitLatchOrSocket().
- 0341d4b10e78 12.19 landed
- 01b01a77fe78 13.15 landed
- b714bc40cf06 14.12 landed
- b82dca2a5a92 15.7 landed
- e79ceafe93a8 16.3 landed
-
Fix resource leak when a FDW's ForeignAsyncRequest function fails
- 555276f85940 14.11 cited