Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-07T23:04:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,
On 2024-04-08 00:55:42 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 8 Apr 2024, at 00:41, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> >> Yup, changing it to this:
> >
> >> #define KeeperBlock(set) ((BumpBlock *) ((char *) (set) +
> >> MAXALIGN(sizeof(BumpContext))))
> >
> >> fixes the issue for me.
> >
> > Mamba is happy with that change, too.
>
> Unrelated to that one, seems like turaco ran into another issue:
>
> running bootstrap script ... TRAP: failed Assert("total_allocated == context->mem_allocated"), File: "bump.c", Line: 808, PID: 7809
>
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=turaco&dt=2024-04-07%2022%3A42%3A54
What makes you think that's unrelated? To me that looks like the same issue?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Commits
-
Update mmgr's README to mention BumpContext
- 58cf2e120e8a 17.0 landed
-
Push dedicated BumpBlocks to the tail of the blocks list
- 6d2fd66b9908 17.0 landed
-
Improve test coverage in bump.c
- bea97cd02ebb 17.0 cited
-
Fix incorrect KeeperBlock macro in bump.c
- 705ec0565371 17.0 landed
-
Use bump memory context for tuplesorts
- 6ed83d5fa55c 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a bump memory allocator
- 29f6a959cfd8 17.0 landed
-
Enlarge bit-space for MemoryContextMethodID
- 0ba8b75e7ea6 17.0 landed