Re: Lowering the default wal_blocksize to 4K
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-10-09T23:36:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2023-10-09 19:26:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 04:08:05PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > There's an alternative approach we could take, which is to write in 4KB > > increments, while keeping 8KB pages. With the current format that's not > > obviously a bad idea. But given there aren't really advantages in 8KB WAL > > pages, it seems we should just go for 4KB? > > How do we handle shorter maximum row lengths and shorter maximum index > entry lengths? The WAL blocksize shouldn't influence either, unless we have a bug somewhere. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
During online checkpoints, insert XLOG_CHECKPOINT_REDO at redo point.
- afd12774ae89 17.0 landed