Re: "variable not found in subplan target list"
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-03-30T10:53:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2023-Mar-29, Amit Langote wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 3:39 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > > So I'm back home and found a couple more weird errors in the log: > > > > > ERROR: mismatching PartitionPruneInfo found at part_prune_index 0 > > > DETALLE: plan node relids (b 1), pruneinfo relids (b 36) > > > > This one reproduces for me. > > I've looked into this one and the attached patch fixes it for me. > Turns out set_plan_refs()'s idea of when the entries from > PlannerInfo.partPruneInfos are transferred into > PlannerGlobal.partPruneInfo was wrong. Thanks for the patch. I've pushed it to github for CI testing, and if there are no problems I'll put it in. > Though, I wonder if we need to keep ec386948948 that introduced the > notion of part_prune_index around if the project that needed it [1] > has moved on to an entirely different approach altogether, one that > doesn't require hacking up the pruning code. Hmm, that's indeed tempting. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Commits
-
Revert "Move PartitionPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt"
- 5472743d9e85 16.0 landed
-
Fix setrefs.c code for adjusting partPruneInfos
- 589bb816499e 16.0 landed
-
Fix corner-case planner failure for MERGE.
- 326a33a289c7 16.0 landed
- bf5c4b3d9da6 15.3 landed