Horton

Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Andrew <pgsqlhackers@andrewrepp.com>
Date: 2023-03-18T01:06:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 01:44:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:43:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think the odds of that yielding a usable dump are nil, so I don't
> >> see why we should bother.
>
> > No objection from me.
>
> OK, pushed with the discussed changes.

Great news, thanks a lot!

Commits

  1. Simplify and speed up pg_dump's creation of parent-table links.

  2. Fix pg_dump for hash partitioning on enum columns.