Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2023-03-03T00:19:24Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState
- a7f107df2b70 18.0 landed
Doc: improve documentation for jsonpath behavior.
- 7014c9a4bba2 17.0 cited

Attachments

v2-0001-WIP-Evaluate-arguments-of-correlated-SubPlans-in-.patch (text/x-diff)

Hi,

On 2023-03-02 13:00:31 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm not opposed to EXPR_PARAM_SET, to be clear. I'll send an updated
> version later. I was just thinking about the correctness in the current
> world.

Attached.

I named the set EEOP_PARAM_SET EEOP_PARAM_EXEC_SET or such, because I
was wondering if there cases it could also be useful in conjunction with
PARAM_EXTERN, and because nothing really depends on the kind of param.

Greetings,

Andres