Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-03-02T05:26:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v5-0001-add-PROCESS_MAIN-to-VACUUM.patch (text/x-diff)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:21:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 12:58:32PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: >> Cutting the toast relation name to 'pg_toast' is a bit confusing to me >> as we have the pg_toast schema. How about using the following query >> instead to improve the readability? >> >> SELECT >> CASE WHEN c.relname IS NULL THEN >> s.relname >> ELSE >> 'toast for ' || c.relname >> END as relname, >> s.vacuum_count >> FROM pg_stat_all_tables s >> LEFT JOIN pg_class c ON s.relid = c.reltoastrelid >> WHERE c.relname = 'vactst' OR s.relname = 'vactst' > > Another tweak that I have learnt to like is to apply a filter with > regexp_replace(), see 090_reindexdb.pl: > regexp_replace(b.indname::text, '(pg_toast.pg_toast_)\\d+(_index)', '\\1<oid>\\2') > > If you make that part of the view definition, the result is the same, > so that's up to which solution one prefers. Here's a new version of the patch that uses Sawada-san's suggestion. Thanks for taking a look. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Improve readability of code PROCESS_MAIN in vacuum_rel()
- ee56048b0ecf 16.0 landed
-
Add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
- 4211fbd8413b 16.0 landed
-
Improve the regression tests of VACUUM (PROCESS_TOAST)
- 46d490ac19a7 16.0 landed
-
Display the leader apply worker's PID for parallel apply workers.
- d540a02a724b 16.0 cited