Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, thomas.munro@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, john.naylor@enterprisedb.com, noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com, jchampion@timescale.com, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, rjuju123@gmail.com
Date: 2023-02-14T04:18:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 05:22:45PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> + Reports whether huge pages are in use by the current process.
> + See <xref linkend="guc-huge-pages"/> for more information.
nitpick: Should this say "server" instead of "current process"?
> +static char *huge_pages_active = "unknown"; /* dynamically set */
nitpick: Does this need to be initialized here?
> + {
> + {"huge_pages_active", PGC_INTERNAL, PRESET_OPTIONS,
> + gettext_noop("Indicates whether huge pages are in use."),
> + NULL,
> + GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE | GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE | GUC_RUNTIME_COMPUTED
> + },
> + &huge_pages_active,
> + "unknown",
> + NULL, NULL, NULL
> + },
I'm curious why you chose to make this a string instead of an enum. There
might be little practical difference, but since there are only three
possible values, I wonder if it'd be better form to make it an enum.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add GUC parameter "huge_pages_status"
- a14354cac0e3 17.0 landed
-
Add check on initial and boot values when loading GUCs
- a73952b79563 16.0 cited
-
Clean up some inconsistencies with GUC declarations
- d9d873bac670 16.0 cited
-
Clean up some GUC declarations and comments
- 7d25958453a6 16.0 cited