Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions

Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Pavel Trukhanov <pavel.trukhanov@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2023-02-02T15:05:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Introduce squashing of constant lists in query jumbling

  2. Make documentation builds reproducible

  3. Include values of A_Const nodes in query jumbling

  4. Teach planner about more monotonic window functions

  5. Split up guc.c for better build speed and ease of maintenance.

> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 03:07:27PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This appears to have massive conflicts.  Would you please rebase?

Sure, I was already mentally preparing myself to do so in the view of
recent changes in query jumbling. Will post soon.