Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2023-01-25T21:26:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, Pushed the patches. So far no fallout, and hoverfly recovered. I just checked a few of the more odd animals (Illumos, Solaris, old OpenBSD, AIX) that already ran without finding new warnings. There's a few more animals to run before I'll fully relax though. On 2023-01-25 08:31:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > Plus, the cost of experimentation here seems very low. Sure, something > might break, but if it does, we can just change it back, or change it > again. That's not really a big deal. The thing that would be a big > deal, maybe, is if we released and only found out afterward that this > caused some subtle and horrible problem for which we had no > back-patchable fix, but that seems pretty unlikely. Agreed. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
plpython: Avoid the need to redefine *printf macros
- 23c12329a755 16.0 landed
-
plpython: Stop undefining _POSIX_C_SOURCE, _XOPEN_SOURCE
- 642e8821d713 16.0 landed