Re: Cygwin cleanup

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 05:54:56PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:40:40PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:16:06PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:38 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > > > > [train wreck]
> > > >
> > > > Oh my, so I'm getting the impression we might actually be totally
> > > > unstable on Cygwin.  Which surprises me because ... wait a minute ...
> > > > lorikeet isn't even running most of the tests.  So... we don't really
> > > > know the degree to which any of this works at all?
> > >
> > > Right.
> > >
> > > Maybe it's of limited interest, but ..
> > >
> > > This updates the patch to build and test with meson.
> > > Which first requires patching some meson.builds.
> > > I guess that's needed for some current BF members, too.
> > > Unfortunately, ccache+PCH causes gcc to crash :(
> >
> > Resending with the 'only-if' line commented (doh).
> > And some fixes to 001 as Andres pointed out by on other thread.
> 
> Is there still some work pending for this thread as Andres had
> committed some part, if so, can you post an updated patch for the
> same.

Thomas, what's your opinion ?