Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-09-07T22:28:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v4-0001-add-worker-type-to-pg_stat_subscription.patch (text/x-diff)
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:36:29PM +1200, Peter Smith wrote: > Modified as suggested. PSA v3. Thanks. I've attached v4 with a couple of small changes. Notably, I've moved the worker_type column to before the pid column, as it felt more natural to me to keep the PID columns together. I've also added an elog(ERROR, ...) for WORKERTYPE_UNKNOWN, as that seems to be the standard practice elsewhere. That being said, are we absolutely confident that this really cannot happen? I haven't looked too closely, but if there is a small race or something that could cause us to see a worker with this type, perhaps it would be better to actually list it as "unknown". Thoughts? -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Add worker type to pg_stat_subscription.
- 13aeaf0797e7 17.0 landed
-
Simplify determining logical replication worker types.
- 2a8b40e36819 17.0 cited