Horton

Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Paul Guo <guopa@vmware.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Brown <michael.brown@discourse.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-09-01T18:31:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:19:13PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> What about (per git grep no-sync doc) pg_receivewal?

I don't think it's applicable there, either.  IIUC that option specifies
whether to sync the data as it is streamed over.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Commits

  1. Adjust documentation for syncfs().

  2. Improve the naming in wal_sync_method code.

  3. Allow using syncfs() in frontend utilities.

  4. Add support for syncfs() in frontend support functions.

  5. Make enum for sync methods available to frontend code.

  6. Move PG_TEMP_FILE* macros to file_utils.h.

  7. Change client-side fsync_fname() to report errors fatally