Re: [PATCH] Add function to_oct
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Cc: Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Eric Radman <ericshane@eradman.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-08-15T15:42:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 07:58:17AM +0200, Vik Fearing wrote: > On 8/15/23 06:11, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> If there are no objections, I'd like to commit this patch soon. > > I just took a look at this (and the rest of the thread). I am a little bit > disappointed that we don't have a generic base conversion function, but even > if we did I think these specialized functions would still be useful. > > No objection from me. Thanks for taking a look. I don't mean for this to preclude a generic base conversion function that would supersede the functions added by this patch. However, I didn't want to hold up $SUBJECT because of something that may or may not happen after lots of discussion. If it does happen within the v17 development cycle, we could probably just remove to_oct/binary. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Add to_bin() and to_oct().
- 260a1f18dae8 17.0 landed