Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>, robertmhaas@gmail.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, smithpb2250@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-08-09T16:51:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:44:42AM -0600, Dave Cramer wrote: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 10:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I agree with Peter: let's use the names in the protocol document >> with a single prefix. I've got mixed feelings about whether that prefix >> should have an underscore, though. > > Well, we're getting closer :) I'm +0.5 for the underscore. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Introduce macros for protocol characters.
- f4b54e1ed985 17.0 landed
-
Remove configure check for z_streamp
- eeb4eeea2c52 17.0 cited