Re: Using defines for protocol characters

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>, robertmhaas@gmail.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, smithpb2250@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-08-09T16:51:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:44:42AM -0600, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 10:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I agree with Peter: let's use the names in the protocol document
>> with a single prefix.  I've got mixed feelings about whether that prefix
>> should have an underscore, though.
> 
> Well, we're getting closer :)

I'm +0.5 for the underscore.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



Commits

  1. Introduce macros for protocol characters.

  2. Remove configure check for z_streamp