Re: Using defines for protocol characters

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-08-08T06:27:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2023-Aug-07, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:02:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes:

> >> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is
> >> acceptable ?
> > 
> > I'm good with Robert's proposal above.
> 
> +1

WFM as well.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough."
https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801



Commits

  1. Introduce macros for protocol characters.

  2. Remove configure check for z_streamp