Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-08-08T06:27:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2023-Aug-07, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:02:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes: > >> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is > >> acceptable ? > > > > I'm good with Robert's proposal above. > > +1 WFM as well. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough." https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801
Commits
-
Introduce macros for protocol characters.
- f4b54e1ed985 17.0 landed
-
Remove configure check for z_streamp
- eeb4eeea2c52 17.0 cited