Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>, YANG Xudong <yangxudong@ymatrix.cn>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, wengyanqing@ymatrix.cn, wanghao@ymatrix.cn
Date: 2023-07-26T04:37:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:16:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:11:02PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: >> Before I look at this again: Are there any objections to another CRC >> implementation for the reason of having no buildfarm member? > > [ ... ] > > Anyway, based on today's state of the buildfarm, we have a buildfarm > member named cisticola that should be able to test this new CRC > implementation, so I see no problem in applying this stuff now if you > think it is in good shape. IMHO we should strive to maintain buildfarm coverage for all the instrinsics used within Postgres, if for no other reason than to ensure future changes do not break those platforms. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Update Solution.pm for new LoongArch CRC symbol
- f25b18500a84 17.0 landed
-
Use native CRC instructions on 64-bit LoongArch
- 4d14ccd6af6e 17.0 landed
-
Recalculate search_path after ALTER ROLE.
- fa2e874946c5 17.0 cited