Thread

Commits

  1. Remove db_user_namespace.

  1. Is anyone using db_user_namespace?

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2023-06-30T21:56:08Z

    Over in pgsql-hackers, I've proposed removing the db_user_namespace
    parameter in v17 [0].  I am personally not aware of anyone using this
    parameter, but I wanted to give folks an opportunity to object in case they
    are using it (or are aware of someone who is).
    
    [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630200509.GA2830328%40nathanxps13
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2023-07-10T17:45:31Z

    On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 02:56:08PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
    > Over in pgsql-hackers, I've proposed removing the db_user_namespace
    > parameter in v17 [0].  I am personally not aware of anyone using this
    > parameter, but I wanted to give folks an opportunity to object in case they
    > are using it (or are aware of someone who is).
    > 
    > [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630200509.GA2830328%40nathanxps13
    
    Bumping this thread.  As long as no objections materialize, I plan to
    remove this parameter shortly.
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?

    Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> — 2023-07-11T01:24:55Z

    2023年7月11日(火) 2:45 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>:
    >
    > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 02:56:08PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
    > > Over in pgsql-hackers, I've proposed removing the db_user_namespace
    > > parameter in v17 [0].  I am personally not aware of anyone using this
    > > parameter, but I wanted to give folks an opportunity to object in case they
    > > are using it (or are aware of someone who is).
    > >
    > > [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630200509.GA2830328%40nathanxps13
    >
    > Bumping this thread.  As long as no objections materialize, I plan to
    > remove this parameter shortly.
    
    Never used it myself; funnily enough I stumbled on it a few weeks back
    and wondered if it was some nifty feature I'd overlooked, then I realized
    I've stumbled across it before several times and each time promptly
    forgotten about it.
    
    Moreover a quick Google search (in quotation marks) brings up a
    few pages mainly of documentation copies, configuration file snippets
    happening to contain "db_user_namespace", a few mostly very non-recent
    mailing list/forum questions, but nothing which screams "this feature
    is used widely".
    
    Regards
    
    Ian Barwick
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2023-07-11T23:39:24Z

    On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:24:55AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
    > Never used it myself; funnily enough I stumbled on it a few weeks back
    > and wondered if it was some nifty feature I'd overlooked, then I realized
    > I've stumbled across it before several times and each time promptly
    > forgotten about it.
    > 
    > Moreover a quick Google search (in quotation marks) brings up a
    > few pages mainly of documentation copies, configuration file snippets
    > happening to contain "db_user_namespace", a few mostly very non-recent
    > mailing list/forum questions, but nothing which screams "this feature
    > is used widely".
    
    Thanks for taking a look!
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2023-07-17T18:50:32Z

    For future reference, this parameter was removed in v17 via commit 884eee5.
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com