Re: BUG #17949: Adding an index introduces serialisation anomalies.
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: artem.anisimov.255@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-06-21T08:58:12Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 01:22:19PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:18 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 09:30:12PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > > > +#if 0 > > > /* > > > * Ignore any claimed entries past what we think is the end of the > > > * relation. It may have been extended after the start of our scan (we > > > * only hold an AccessShareLock, and it could be inserts from this > > > * backend). > > > */ > > > if (block >= hscan->rs_nblocks) > > > return false; > > > +#endif > > > > Great, thanks! Can confirm, after applying both the posted patch and the > > change above the issue is not reproducible anymore. > > Here's a cleaned-up version of the first two changes. What do you > think about the assertions I make in the commit message for 0002? Yep, it sounds correct to me. After a quick look I couldn't find where exactly the similar code lives in the pre-tableam version, so can't say anything about back-patching there.
Commits
-
Fix race in SSI interaction with bitmap heap scan.
- 814f3c8e4868 11.21 landed
- 17b8887c29e5 12.16 landed
- 8976ac5c5c00 13.12 landed
- 3f7d3a77e18d 14.9 landed
- ab265e98500b 15.4 landed
- bcc93a389ce3 17.0 landed
- d03d9a2614fd 16.0 landed
-
Fix race in SSI interaction with gin fast path.
- 13f127800fed 11.21 landed
- 255a925d333b 12.16 landed
- fc15473840bc 13.12 landed
- fb663f38790e 14.9 landed
- d34aa0a2f4f3 15.4 landed
- 126552c85c1c 17.0 landed
- 12529028a4e5 16.0 landed
-
Fix race in SSI interaction with empty btrees.
- 0048c3b51549 11.21 landed
- fe88497b4d0b 12.16 landed
- 8f705d7b9d01 13.12 landed
- ae6d536ed0dc 14.9 landed
- 0f275b0ee8e4 15.4 landed
- f9b7fc651a99 17.0 landed
- 0cb1fb2c9bf8 16.0 landed
-
Re-think predicate locking on GIN indexes.
- 0bef1c0678d9 11.0 cited