Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-05-19T23:04:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2023-05-19 15:44:09 -0700, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I have two more runs of the benchmark in progress so we will have 3 > >> results for each of the test cases to confirm that the small regressions > >> are repeatable. > >> > > > I repeated the benchmark a few times using a more recent PG16 build (git > sha 08c45ae2) and have yet to see any significant changes. So that is good > news. My testing scripts have been improved so I should be able to finish > the next round of tests in less time. With "yet to see any significant changes" do you mean that the runs are comparable with earlier runs, showing the same regression? Or that the regression vanished? Or ...? Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Add back SQLValueFunction for SQL keywords
- d8c3106bb60e 16.0 landed
-
Add missing TAP test name
- 1ab763fc22ad 16.0 cited
-
Have the planner consider Incremental Sort for DISTINCT
- 3c6fc58209f2 16.0 cited