Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert structural changes to not-null constraints
- 6f8bb7c1e961 17.0 landed
-
Fix inconsistencies in error messages
- 21ac38f498b3 17.0 landed
-
Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints
- d45597f72fe5 17.0 landed
-
Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables
- 13daa33fa5a6 17.0 landed
-
Better handle indirect constraint drops
- 0cd711271d42 17.0 cited
-
Don't try to assign smart names to constraints
- d72d32f52d26 17.0 cited
-
Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance
- d9f686a72ee9 17.0 landed
-
ATTACH PARTITION: Don't match a PK with a UNIQUE constraint
- cee8db3f680b 17.0 landed
-
Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance
- c3709100be73 17.0 landed
-
Check stack depth in new recursive functions
- b0f7dd915bca 17.0 landed
-
Move privilege check to the right place
- ac22a9545ca9 17.0 cited
-
Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints
- 3af721794272 17.0 landed
-
Fix not-null constraint test
- d0ec2ddbe088 17.0 landed
-
Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint
- 9b581c534186 17.0 cited
-
Catalog not-null constraints
- b0e96f311985 17.0 cited
-
parallel_schedule: add comment on event_trigger test dependency
- c8e43c22be27 17.0 landed
-
Revert "Catalog NOT NULL constraints" and fallout
- 9ce04b50e120 16.0 landed
-
Adjust contrib/sepgsql regression test expected outputs.
- 76c111a7f166 16.0 landed
-
Fix table name clash in recently introduced test
- 728015a47016 16.0 landed
-
Catalog NOT NULL constraints
- e056c557aef4 16.0 landed
-
Change the rules for inherited CHECK constraints to be essentially the same
- cd902b331dc4 8.4.0 cited
Hi, On 2023-04-07 18:26:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2023-04-07 17:46:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> After quickly eyeing the diffs, I'm just going to take the new output > >> as good. I'm not surprised that there are additional output messages > >> given the additional catalog entries this made. I *am* a bit surprised > >> that some messages seem to have disappeared --- are there places where > >> this resulted in fewer catalog accesses than before? Nonetheless, > >> there's no good reason to assume this test is exposing any bugs. > > > I wonder if the issue is that the new paths miss a hook invocation. > > Perhaps. I'm content to silence the buildfarm for today; we can > investigate more closely later. Makes sense. I think https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2023-04-07%2021%3A16%3A04 might point out a problem with the pg_dump or pg_upgrade backward compat paths: --- C:\\prog\\bf/root/upgrade.drongo/HEAD/origin-REL9_5_STABLE.sql.fixed 2023-04-07 23:51:27.641328600 +0000 +++ C:\\prog\\bf/root/upgrade.drongo/HEAD/converted-REL9_5_STABLE-to-HEAD.sql.fixed 2023-04-07 23:51:27.672571900 +0000 @@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ -- Name: entry; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: buildfarm -- CREATE TABLE public.entry ( - accession text, - eid integer, - txid smallint + accession text NOT NULL, + eid integer NOT NULL, + txid smallint NOT NULL ); ALTER TABLE public.entry OWNER TO buildfarm; -- Looks like we're making up NOT NULL constraints when migrating from 9.5, for some reason? Greetings, Andres Freund