Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-10-25T23:15:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Oct-25, Finnerty, Jim wrote: > Or if you know the frequencies of the highly frequent values of the > partitioning key at the time the partition bounds are defined, you > could define hash ranges that contain approximately the same number of > rows in each partition. A parallel sequential scan of all partitions > would then perform better because data skew is minimized. This sounds very much like list partitioning to me. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The problem with the future is that it keeps turning into the present" (Hobbes)
Commits
-
meson: Split 'main' suite into 'regress' and 'isolation'
- a5ac3e76fe96 16.0 landed
-
Resolve partition strategy during early parsing
- 5fca91025e05 16.0 landed