Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, cary.huang@highgo.ca, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, satyanarlapuram@gmail.com
Date: 2022-10-08T21:52:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add basic TAP tests for the low-level backup method, take two
- 071e3ad59d6f 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Make all Perl warnings fatal
- c5385929593d 17.0 cited
-
Add PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::advance_wal
- c161ab74f76a 17.0 cited
-
Rename wal_keep_segments to wal_keep_size.
- c3fe108c025e 14.0 cited
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 07:49:21PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > SwitchFromArchiveToStreamEnabled() seemed better at this point. I'm > attaching the v7 patch with that change. Please review it further. As I mentioned upthread [0], I'm still a little concerned that this patch will cause the state machine to go straight from archive recovery to streaming replication, skipping recovery from pg_wal. I wonder if this could be resolved by moving the standby to the pg_wal phase instead. Concretely, this line + if (switchSource) + break; would instead change currentSource from XLOG_FROM_ARCHIVE to XLOG_FROM_PG_WAL before the call to XLogFileReadAnyTLI(). I suspect the behavior would be basically the same, but it would maintain the existing ordering. However, I do see the following note elsewhere in xlogrecovery.c: * The segment can be fetched via restore_command, or via walreceiver having * streamed the record, or it can already be present in pg_wal. Checking * pg_wal is mainly for crash recovery, but it will be polled in standby mode * too, in case someone copies a new segment directly to pg_wal. That is not * documented or recommended, though. Given this information, the present behavior might not be too important, but I don't see a point in changing it without good reason. [0] https://postgr.es/m/20220906215704.GA2084086%40nathanxps13 -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com