Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-10-07T14:03:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 07:26:08AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> I checked this code again, and I don't think some refactoring is easy.
> getFiltersFromFile is not duplicated. It is just probably badly named.
>
> These routines are used from pg_dump, pg_dumpall and pg_restore. There are
> significant differences in supported objects and in types used for returned
> lists (dumpOptions, SimpleStringList, and RestoreOptions). If I have one
> routine, then I need to implement some mechanism for specification of
> supported objects, and a special type that can be used as a proxy between
> caller and parser to hold lists of parsed values. To be names less
> confusing I renamed them to read_dump_filters, read_dumpall_filters and
> read_restore_filters

Ah right, I missed the different argument types.  Now that the functions have
improved names it looks way clearer, and it seems just fine!



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix array subscript warnings

  2. Read include/exclude commands for dump/restore from file

  3. Allow records to span multiple lines in pg_hba.conf and pg_ident.conf.