Re: support for MERGE

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Daniel Westermann <dwe@dbi-services.com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2022-03-12T15:36:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
FYI I intend to get the ModifyTable split patch (0001+0003) pushed
hopefully on Tuesday or Wednesday next week, unless something really
ugly is found on it.

As for MERGE proper, I'm aiming at getting that one pushed on the week
starting March 21st, though of course I'll spend some more time on it
and will probably post further versions of it before that.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings (indeed, all arrays), for
surely where thou typest "foo" someone someday shall type
"supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" (5th Commandment for C programmers)



Commits

  1. Doc fixes for MERGE statement

  2. MERGE docs adjustments

  3. Link to MVCC docs in MERGE docs

  4. Fix EXPLAIN MERGE output when no tuples are processed

  5. Make EXPLAIN MERGE output format more compact

  6. Add support for MERGE SQL command

  7. Split ExecUpdate and ExecDelete into reusable pieces

  8. Add API of sorts for transition table handling in trigger.c

  9. Represent Lists as expansible arrays, not chains of cons-cells.