Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-06T22:33:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2022-03-06 07:46:04 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > This is an area not currently touched by the buildfarm's cross version > upgrade testing, which basically compares a pre-upgrade and post-upgrade > dump of the databases. The upgraded cluster does contain > contrib_regression_ltree. > > I'm open to suggestions on how we might improve the buildfarm's testing > of upgraded indexes generally. One thing that's likely worth doing as part of the cross version upgrade test, even if it wouldn't even help in this case, is to run amcheck post upgrade. Just dumping data isn't going to touch indices at all. A sequence of pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck; would make sense. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops
- bad202c615c9 13.7 landed
- 7d30f59da714 14.3 landed
- 7e74aafc4335 15.0 landed
-
Implement operator class parameters
- 911e70207703 13.0 cited