Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-03T07:16:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow underscores in integer and numeric constants.
- faff8f8e47f1 16.0 cited
-
Remove special outfuncs/readfuncs handling of RangeVar.catalogname.
- 3cece34be842 16.0 cited
-
Remove extra space from dumped ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.
- 2af33369e794 16.0 cited
-
Create FKs properly when attaching table as partition
- b0284bfb1db5 16.0 cited
-
psql: improve tab-complete's handling of variant SQL names.
- 02b8048ba5dc 15.0 cited
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:06:52PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:03:06AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > I lost commit with this change. I am sending updated patch. Also, another thing is the size of the patch. It's probably the minimum to have a consistent working implementation, but maybe we can still split it to make review easier? For instance, maybe having: - the pg_variable part on its own, without a way to use them, maybe with syscache helpers - the main session variable implementation and test coverage - plpgsql support and test coverage - pg_dump support and test coverage It wouldn't make the main patch that small but could still help quite a bit. Any better suggestion?