Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-02T05:09:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2022-03-02 07:35:46 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > Pushed. Thanks! Working on rebasing shared memory stats over this. Feels *much* better so far. While rebasing, I was wondering why pgstat_reset_subscription_counter() has "all subscription counters" support. We don't have a function to reset all function stats or such either. I'm asking because support for that is what currently prevents sub stats from using the more general function for reset. It's an acceptable amount of code, but if we don't really need it I'd rather not have it / add it in a more general way if we want it. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Reconsider pg_stat_subscription_workers view.
- 7a8507329085 15.0 landed
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited