Re: pgbench: using prepared BEGIN statement in a pipeline could cause an error
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
From: Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@yesql.se, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2022-03-01T06:55:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v4-pgbench-prepare.patch (text/x-diff) patch v4
Hi Horiguchi-san, On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:50:25 +0900 (JST) Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > At Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:26:43 +0900, Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote in > > Thank you for pointing it out! > > I attached the updated patch. > > I think we want more elabolative comment for the new place of > preparing as you mentioned in the first mail. Thank you for your suggestion. I added comments on the prepareCommands() call as in the updated patch. Regards, Yugo Nagata Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Commits
-
Fix pgbench in prepared mode with an empty pipeline
- 8f5e42d33469 16.0 landed
- 34f51196573c 15.4 landed
-
pgbench: Prepare commands in pipelines in advance
- 663e50e83211 14.8 landed
- 108a22bd14d4 15.3 landed
- 038f586d5f1d 16.0 landed
-
Add -M (query mode) option per ITAGAKI Takahiro
- 49639a7b2c52 8.4.0 cited