Horton

Re: speed up a logical replica setup

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

View thread
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-02-21T23:28:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. pg_createsubscriber: Remove obsolete comment

  2. pg_createsubscriber: Fix an unpredictable recovery wait time.

  3. Fix unstable test in 040_pg_createsubscriber.

  4. Fix the testcase introduced in commit 81d20fbf7a.

  5. Further weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.

  6. Temporarily(?) weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.

  7. Make pg_createsubscriber warn if publisher has two-phase commit enabled.

  8. Make pg_createsubscriber more wary about quoting connection parameters.

  9. pg_createsubscriber: Remove failover replication slots on subscriber

  10. pg_createsubscriber: Remove replication slot check on primary

  11. pg_createsubscriber: Only --recovery-timeout controls the end of recovery process

  12. pg_createsubscriber: creates a new logical replica from a standby server

  13. Add some const decorations

  14. Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()

  15. Remove MSVC scripts

Hi,

On 2022-02-21 09:09:12 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> Logical replication has been used to migration with minimal downtime. However,
> if you are dealing with a big database, the amount of required resources (disk
> -- due to WAL retention) increases as the backlog (WAL) increases. Unless you
> have a generous amount of resources and can wait for long period of time until
> the new replica catches up, creating a logical replica is impracticable on
> large databases.

Indeed.


> DESIGN
> 
> The conversion requires 8 steps.
> 
> 1. Check if the target data directory has the same system identifier than the
> source data directory.
> 2. Stop the target server if it is running as a standby server. (Modify
> recovery parameters requires a restart.)
> 3. Create one replication slot per specified database on the source server. One
> additional replication slot is created at the end to get the consistent LSN
> (This consistent LSN will be used as (a) a stopping point for the recovery
> process and (b) a starting point for the subscriptions).
> 4. Write recovery parameters into the target data directory and start the
> target server (Wait until the target server is promoted).
> 5. Create one publication (FOR ALL TABLES) per specified database on the source
> server.
> 6. Create one subscription per specified database on the target server (Use
> replication slot and publication created in a previous step. Don't enable the
> subscriptions yet).
> 7. Sets the replication progress to the consistent LSN that was got in a
> previous step.
> 8. Enable the subscription for each specified database on the target server.

I think the system identifier should also be changed, otherwise you can way
too easily get into situations trying to apply WAL from different systems to
each other. Not going to end well, obviously.


> This tool does not take a base backup. It can certainly be included later.
> There is already a tool do it: pg_basebackup.

It would make sense to allow to call pg_basebackup from the new tool. Perhaps
with a --pg-basebackup-parameters or such.



Greetings,

Andres Freund