Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-21T16:17:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2022-02-21 14:49:01 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > * stats_reset (Time at which these statistics were last reset) > > > > > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep, > > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines. > > > > pg_stat_subscription_stats :) > Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let > us see what others think. One more option could be > pg_stat_subscription_replication. It was a joke, making light of our bad naming in pg_stat_*, not a serious suggestion... Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Reconsider pg_stat_subscription_workers view.
- 7a8507329085 15.0 landed
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited