Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-21T16:17:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-02-21 14:49:01 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > * stats_reset (Time at which these statistics were last reset)
> > >
> > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
> > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
> >
> > pg_stat_subscription_stats :)

> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
> us see what others think. One more option could be
> pg_stat_subscription_replication.

It was a joke, making light of our bad naming in pg_stat_*, not a serious
suggestion...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



Commits

  1. Reconsider pg_stat_subscription_workers view.

  2. Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.