Re: archive modules
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: 2022-02-03T21:25:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fix-basic-archive-test.patch (text/x-diff) patch
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:15:30PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> > So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal, >> > or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not >> > sure what the existing precedents are, if any. >> >> The only precedent I've found so far is test_decoding, which sets wal_level >> to "logical." Perhaps we can just set it to "replica" in >> basic_archive.conf. > > Yeah, that seems to make sense. 024_archive_recovery.pl seems to do something similar. Patch attached. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Disallow setting archive_library and archive_command at the same time
- d627ce3b706d 16.0 landed
-
Restore archive_command documentation
- ba50834551f9 16.0 landed
- 5f56933ea5d5 15.0 landed
-
Doc: improve explanation of when custom GUCs appear in pg_settings.
- 44a51dc990cc 15.0 landed
- 857808a4116b 16.0 landed
-
doc: Add note about re-archiving of same WAL files in docs.
- 3cabe45a819f 16.0 cited
-
In basic_archive tests, insist on wal_level='replica'.
- 00c360a89c1a 15.0 landed
-
Allow archiving via loadable modules.
- 5ef1eefd76f4 15.0 landed
-
Move the code to archive files via the shell to a separate file.
- aeb4cc9ea07a 15.0 landed