Re: BUG #17386: btree index corruption after reindex concurrently on write heavy table
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Maxim Boguk <maxim.boguk@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-02T21:01:49Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Hi, On 2022-01-28 18:34:18 -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > If this bug is like the ones fixed between 14.0 and 14.1, the base backup > and WAL won't help us, unfortunately. FWIW: I've found that once one has identified a specific page / tuple that is damaged, searching the WAL for the record causing the problem is really helpful. Once that record is identified, the records from the transaction logging the problematic WAL record(s) can often identify the concrete activity at the time. And looking at the WAL records of concurrently running transactions can often identify the concurrency problem. It might not be worth it in this case (given we have a suspicion it's 18b87b20), but when you have a base backup from before the problem, and all incremental WAL, just replaying forward incrementally and testing for the problem can help narrow down problems a lot. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix possible HOT corruption when RECENTLY_DEAD changes to DEAD while pruning.
- 18b87b201f73 15.0 cited