Re: row filtering for logical replication
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On 2022-Jan-21, houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote: > Personally, I'm a little hesitant to put the check at DDL level, because > adding check at DDLs like ATTACH PARTITION/CREATE PARTITION OF ( [1] > explained why we need to check these DDLs) looks a bit restrictive and > user might also complain about that. Put the check in > CheckCmdReplicaIdentity seems more acceptable because it is consistent > with the existing behavior which has few complaints from users AFAIK. I think logical replication is currently so limited that there's very few people that can put it to real use. So I suggest we should not take the small number of complaints about the current behavior as very valuable, because it just means that not a lot of people are using logical replication in the first place. But once these new functionalities are introduced, it will start to become actually useful and it will be then when users will exercise and notice weird behavior. If ATTACH PARTITION or CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF don't let you specify replica identity, I suspect it's because both partitioning and logical replication were developed in parallel, and neither gave too much thought to the other. So these syntax corners went unnoticed. I suspect that a better way to attack this problem is to let ALTER TABLE ... ATTACH PARTITION and CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF specify a replica identity as necessary. My suggestion is to avoid painting us into a corner from which it will be impossible to get out later. -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La espina, desde que nace, ya pincha" (Proverbio africano)