Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2022-01-06T00:12:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add SLRU tests for 64-bit page case
- a60b8a58f435 17.0 landed
-
Make use FullTransactionId in 2PC filenames
- 5a1dfde8334b 17.0 landed
-
Use larger segment file names for pg_notify
- 2cdf131c46e6 17.0 landed
-
Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers
- 4ed8f0913bfd 17.0 landed
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 06:51:37PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:22:50PM +0000, Finnerty, Jim wrote: > > I'm concerned about the maintainability impact of having 2 new > > on-disk page formats. It's already complex enough with XIDs and > > multixact-XIDs. > > > > If the lack of space for the two epochs in the special data area is > > a problem only in an upgrade scenario, why not resolve the problem > > before completing the upgrade process like a kind of post-process > > pg_repack operation that converts all "double xmax" pages to > > the "double-epoch" page format? i.e. maybe the "double xmax" > > representation is needed as an intermediate representation during > > upgrade, but after upgrade completes successfully there are no pages > > with the "double-xmax" representation. This would eliminate a whole > > class of coding errors and would make the code dealing with 64-bit > > XIDs simpler and more maintainable. > > Well, yes, we could do this, and it would avoid the complexity of having > to support two XID representations, but we would need to accept that > fast pg_upgrade would be impossible in such cases, since every page > would need to be checked and potentially updated. > > You might try to do this while the server is first started and running > queries, but I think we found out from the online checkpoint patch that I think you meant the online checksum patch. Which this reminded me of, too. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/31/2611/ > having the server in an intermediate state while running queries is very > complex --- it might be simpler to just accept two XID formats all the > time than enabling the server to run with two formats for a short > period. My big point is that this needs more thought. -- Justin