Re: A question about wording in messages

On 2022-Sep-16, Amit Kapila wrote:

> We only want to commit the changes to 15 (a) if those fixes a problem
> introduced in 15, or (b) those are for a bug fix. I think the error
> message improvements fall into none of those categories, we can map it
> to (b) but I feel those are an improvement in the current messages and
> don't seem critical to me.

IMO at least the GUC one does fix a problem related to the wording of a
user-visible message, which also flows into the translations.  I prefer
to have that one fixed it in 15 also.  The other messages (errors) don't
seem very interesting because they're not as visible, so I don't care if
those are not backpatched.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"This is a foot just waiting to be shot"                (Andrew Dunstan)