Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-09-15T20:25:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2022-09-09 17:36:45 +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > I suggest we focus on saving the memory first and then think about the > performance, if necessary. Personally I think the locks part is at least as important - it's what makes the production impact higher. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
pg_buffercache: Add pg_buffercache_summary()
- 2589434ae0fb 16.0 landed
-
Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.
- a448e49bcbe4 16.0 cited