Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: cyberdemn@gmail.com
Cc: bungina@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-08-31T05:36:38Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
At Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:30:31 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in > What do you think about that? By the way don't you add an CF entry for this? -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
Commits
-
Fix newly introduced 010_keep_recycled_wals.pl
- 2fb3919356fb 17.3 landed
- 50010c6f6c4d 16.7 landed
- 93d8d4fe1255 15.11 landed
- 1c5fe56bc259 14.16 landed
- b5be29ecafe1 18.0 landed
-
Avoid deleting critical WAL segments during pg_rewind
- ea1649c352f6 16.6 landed
- e28cf2fbc222 15.10 landed
- cb844d66b587 17.2 landed
- ba25358413e4 14.15 landed
- 90bcc7c2db1d 18.0 landed