Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-08-29T22:04:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Here is a patch to rearrange the logic slightly and also add a test > case memorializing the intended behavior. Without this change, the > regression test included in the patch fails like this: > > ERROR: no possible grantors > > ...which is never supposed to happen. The grantor column in the expected test output refers to "rhaas", so I imagine the test only passes on your machines. Should we create a new grantor role for this test? -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix a bug in roles_is_member_of.
- 0101f770a05b 16.0 landed
-
docs: Fix up some out-of-date references to INHERIT/NOINHERIT.
- 620ac285483f 16.0 landed
-
Allow grant-level control of role inheritance behavior.
- e3ce2de09d81 16.0 landed
-
Make role grant system more consistent with other privileges.
- ce6b672e4455 16.0 cited
-
Document basebackup_to_shell.required_role.
- 26a0c025e233 15.0 landed