Re: [BUG] parenting a PK constraint to a self-FK one (Was: Self FK oddity when attaching a partition)
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Cc: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-08-23T17:50:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Aug-23, Zhihong Yu wrote: > A bigger question I have, even with the additional filtering, is what if > there are multiple constraints ? > How do we decide which unique / primary key constraint to return ? > > Looks like there is no known SQL statements leading to such state, but > should we consider such possibility ? I don't think we care, but feel free to experiment and report any problems. You should be able to have multiple UNIQUE constraints on the same column, for example. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Postgres is bloatware by design: it was built to house PhD theses." (Joey Hellerstein, SIGMOD annual conference 2002)
Commits
-
Create FKs properly when attaching table as partition
- c301e1c0c09c 15.1 landed
- b0284bfb1db5 16.0 landed
- ab70b3a52fde 12.13 landed
- 41b6e7c9a32e 13.9 landed
- 18865f4df9ca 14.6 landed
-
Fix self-referencing foreign keys with partitioned tables
- 7d520e68ea1e 13.9 landed
- 669803af04e6 12.13 landed
- 614a406b4ff1 16.0 landed
- 6083132abdd4 15.0 landed
- 483d26930b4c 14.6 landed
-
Fix GetForeignKey*Triggers for self-referential FKs
- 8c848cd4b8e9 16.0 landed
- 68b0da67794e 15.0 landed
-
Choose FK name correctly during partition attachment
- e7936f8b3e57 16.0 landed
- ade2409b18e9 15.0 landed
- 80ef25b1adb1 13.9 landed
- 640c20d6266d 14.6 landed
- 562e100aeeaf 12.13 landed
-
Update SQL features
- 7e367924e33e 15.0 cited
-
Restore the previous semantics of get_constraint_index().
- 641f3dffcdf1 15.0 cited