Horton

Re: doc phrase: "inheritance child"

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-07-28T16:30:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2022-Jun-30, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> I updated the language to say "values from".  Is this better ?
> 
> And rebased to include changes to 401f623c7.

Applied to 15 and master, thanks.

> BTW nobody complained about my "child child" typo.

:-(

BTW I didn't notice your annotation in the CF app until I had already
pushed it and went there to update the status.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
(Lincoln Yeoh)

Commits

  1. doc: avoid saying "inheritance" ...