Horton

Re: remove more archiving overhead

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2022-07-26T16:22:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:26:23PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Anyway, since the patches look good to me, I pushed them. Thanks a lot!
> If necessary, we can keep improving the docs later.

Thanks!

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Commits

  1. Be more prescriptive in new doc about re-archiving of same WAL file.

  2. doc: Add note about re-archiving of same WAL files in docs.

  3. Reduce overhead of renaming archive status files.