Re: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-07-21T09:02:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:09:09 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote in
> Hi,
>
> After the commit [1], is it correct to say errmsg("invalid data in file
> \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE))); in do_pg_backup_stop() when we hold the
> contents in backend global memory, not actually reading from backup_label
> file? However, it is correct to say that in read_backup_label.
>
> IMO, we can either say "invalid backup_label contents found" or we can be
> more descriptive and say "invalid "START WAL LOCATION" line found in
> backup_label content" and "invalid "BACKUP FROM" line found in
> backup_label content" and so on.
>
> Thoughts?
Previously there the case the "char *labelfile" is loaded from a file,
but currently it is alwasy a string build on the process. In that
sense, nowadays it is a kind of internal error, which I think is not
supposed to be exposed to users.
So I think we can leave the code alone to avoid back-patching
obstacles. But if we decided to change the code around, I'd like to
change the string into a C struct, so that we don't need to parse it.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Commits
-
Fix some comments of do_pg_backup_start() and do_pg_backup_stop()
- 2e560b974ec7 16.0 landed
-
Remove dependency to StringInfo in xlogbackup.{c.h}
- e1e6f8f3dfe1 16.0 landed
-
Refactor creation of backup_label and backup history files
- 7d708093b740 16.0 landed
-
Move basebackup code to new directory src/backend/backup
- a8c012869763 16.0 cited
-
Remove exclusive backup mode
- 39969e2a1e4d 15.0 cited