Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-07-15T08:12:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Jul-15, Simon Riggs wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 04:44, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> > This patch has been marked as waiting for a review, however the CF bot
> > is completely red:
> 
> Yes, it is failing, but so is current HEAD, with some kind of libpq
> pipelining error.

Hmm, is it?  Where can I see that?  The buildfarm looks OK ...

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Before you were born your parents weren't as boring as they are now. They
got that way paying your bills, cleaning up your room and listening to you
tell them how idealistic you are."  -- Charles J. Sykes' advice to teenagers



Commits

  1. Tweak a bit the new TAP tests of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  2. Rework logic and simplify syntax of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  3. Add more tests for REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM with relfilenode changes