Re: array_cat anycompatible change is breaking xversion upgrade tests
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: 2022-06-24T13:30:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 04:09:46PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Sorry for bumping old thread. Please find this newer thread+patch here ;) https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220614230949.GX29853@telsasoft.com > On 25 May 2021, at 21:14, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > > Such aggregate functions should be dropped before upgrade/restore and then > > re-created afterwards using the "anycompatible" functions. The affected > > functions are: array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position, > > array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket. > > We've just stumbled upon the problem in our service. Would it be backpatchable to add this check to pg_upgrade? I guess you mean to backpatch to v14 for people upgrading from v13. I realized that my latest patch would break upgrades from old servers, which do not have array_position/s nor width_bucket, so ::reprocedure would fail. Maybe Andrey's way is better (checking proname rather than its OID). -- Justin
Commits
-
doc: add PG 14 relnote item about array function references
- 25dfb5a831a1 14.0 landed
-
Work around cross-version-upgrade issues created by commit 9e38c2bb5.
- d3d4f7233a3e 11.11 landed
- cea97d98f167 9.6.21 landed
- 97f73a978fc1 14.0 landed
- 6c91e28224f6 9.5.25 landed
- 5ce51f8280d3 12.6 landed
- 5c456d308071 13.2 landed
- 253f02c46f0e 10.16 landed