Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Attachments
Hi, On 2022-06-17 10:30:55 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2022-06-17 10:33:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > > The remaining difference looks like it's largely caused by the > > > enable_timeout_after(IDLE_STATS_UPDATE_TIMEOUT, ...) introduced as part of the > > > pgstats patch. It's only really visible when I pin a single connection pgbench > > > to the same CPU core as the server (which gives a ~16% boost here). > > > > > It's not the timeout itself - that we amortize nicely (via 09cf1d522). It's > > > that enable_timeout_after() does a GetCurrentTimestamp(). > > > > > Not sure yet what the best way to fix that is. > > > > Maybe not queue a new timeout if the old one is still active? > > Right now we disable the timer after ReadCommand(). We can of course change > that. At first I thought we might need more bookkeeping to do so, to avoid > ProcessInterrupts() triggering pgstat_report_stat() when the timer fires > later, but we probably can jury-rig something with DoingCommandRead && > IsTransactionOrTransactionBlock() or such. Here's a patch for that. One thing I noticed is that disable_timeout() calls do schedule_alarm(GetCurrentTimestamp()) if there's any other active timeout, even if the to-be-disabled timer is already disabled. Of course callers of disable_timeout() can guard against that using get_timeout_active(), but that spreads repetitive code around... I opted to add a fastpath for that, instead of using get_timeout_active(). Afaics that's safe to do without disarming the signal handler, but I'd welcome a look from somebody that knows this code. > I guess one advantage of something like this could be that we could possibly > move the arming of the timeout to pgstat.c. But that looks like it might be > more complicated than really worth it. I didn't do that yet, but am curious whether others think this would be preferrable. > > BTW, it looks like that patch also falsified this comment > > (postgres.c:4478): > > > > * At most one of these timeouts will be active, so there's no need to > > * worry about combining the timeout.c calls into one. > > Hm, yea. I guess we can just disable them at once. With the proposed change we don't need to change the separate timeout.c to one, or update the comment, as it should now look the same as 14. I also attached my heavily-WIP patches for the ExprEvalStep issues, I accidentally had only included a small part of the contents of the json fix. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
JSON_TABLE: Add support for NESTED paths and columns
- bb766cde63b4 17.0 landed
-
Add basic JSON_TABLE() functionality
- de3600452b61 17.0 landed
-
Add SQL/JSON query functions
- 6185c9737cf4 17.0 landed
-
Add soft error handling to some expression nodes
- aaaf9449ec6b 17.0 landed
-
Adjust populate_record_field() to handle errors softly
- 1edb3b491bee 17.0 landed
-
Refactor code used by jsonpath executor to fetch variables
- faa2b953ba3b 17.0 landed
-
Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
- 03734a7fed7d 17.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: support the IS JSON predicate
- 6ee30209a6f1 16.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functions
- 7081ac46ace8 16.0 landed
-
Add static assertion ensuring sizeof(ExprEvalStep) <= 64 bytes
- 78be04e4c672 16.0 landed
-
Remove size increase in ExprEvalStep caused by hashed saops
- 30efc3b5a364 15.0 landed
- fe3caa143937 16.0 landed
-
pgstat: reduce timer overhead by leaving timer running.
- 4a37527fde3c 15.0 landed
- 056cc366fafa 16.0 landed
-
expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size.
- 5a1ab894f758 15.0 landed
- 67b26703b415 16.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON query functions
- 1a36bc9dba8e 15.0 cited
-
Speedup ScalarArrayOpExpr evaluation
- 50e17ad281b8 14.0 cited