Re: Proposal: adding a better description in psql command about large objects
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Thibaud W." <thibaud.walkowiak@dalibo.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-06-03T15:23:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 11:12:11AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > * How about "write large object to file" and "read large object from > file"? As it stands, if you are not totally sure which direction is > export and which is import, this description teaches you little. +1 > * While we're here, it seems like this whole group was placed at the > end because of add-it-to-the-end-itis, not because that was the > most logical place for it. The other commands that interact with > the server are mostly further up. My first thought is to move it > to just after the "Informational" group, but I'm not especially > set on that. Making it not-last might make it harder to get away > with the inconsistent indentation, though. Another option could be to move it after the "Input/Output" section so that it's closer to some other commands that involve files. I can't say I have a strong opinion about whether/where to move it, though. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Improve psql \?'s description of large-object-related commands.
- 1fbe94084fd3 15.0 landed