Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Петър Славов <pet.slavov@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-05-31T19:46:38Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 2022-May-31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > At this point, I'm clear that d9d076222f5b needs to be reverted because > of the interactions with HOT prune, but it's not at all clear to me what > is the relationship of the other two commits to bugs. I am going to > revert that one now, so that we can continue to diagnose any lingering > problem that may be related to the other two commits -- but perhaps it > is something else. Reverted. (This is the same commit that Michaël found to blame at the start of the thread.) -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Commits
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- e28bb8851969 15.0 landed
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 landed
-
Fix possible HOT corruption when RECENTLY_DEAD changes to DEAD while pruning.
- 18b87b201f73 15.0 cited